The 2009 consensus report of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences on the state of forensic science in the United States, finding that many forensic disciplines other than DNA analysis lack validated scientific foundations and enforceable standards, and recommending systematic reform.
Facts
Citation
URLhttps://www.nationalacademies.org/publications/12589
Source TypeOrganization Page
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A National Research Council consensus report, the leading scholarly assessment of forensic science practice in the United States. Sources
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Forensic Disciplines and Methods, 11 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 general references.
- Sources, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Well-attested
9Forensic Disciplines and Methods
Scholarly debate
1Forensic Disciplines and Methods
General References
5Forensic Disciplines and Methods
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.