Home›Sources›Ulery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)SourcesUlery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)Journal ArticleCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextCrime and Justice Atlas. "Ulery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-crime.interactiveatlas.org/sources/pnas-ulery-2011-fingerprint-accuracy.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextCrime and Justice Atlas. (n.d.). Ulery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011). Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-crime.interactiveatlas.org/sources/pnas-ulery-2011-fingerprint-accuracyCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{crimeandjusticeatlas-ulery-hicklin-buscaglia-and-roberts-accu, author = {Crime and Justice Atlas}, title = {Ulery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-crime.interactiveatlas.org/sources/pnas-ulery-2011-fingerprint-accuracy}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXReference and ClassificationDevelopingA 2011 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences measuring the accuracy of 169 latent print examiners across 744 fingerprint comparisons drawn from casework-representative material, the first large-scale black-box test of examiner error rates.FactsSourcesClaims Backed By This Source (8 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsCitationPublisherWell-attestedNational Academy of SciencesPublication YearWell-attested2011URLWell-attestedhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1018707108Source TypeWell-attestedWebsiteAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1SourcesUlery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)tier 1National Academy of Sciences, 2011View the SourceClaims Backed By This Source (8 claims)This source backs 8 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.Forensic Disciplines and Methods, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Well-attested7Forensic Disciplines and MethodsDactyloscopySourcesUlery, Hicklin, Buscaglia and Roberts, Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Print Decisions (PNAS, 2011)General References1Forensic Disciplines and MethodsDactyloscopyComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year